Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors: Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, Heise T, Bolinder J, Dahlqvist S, Schwarz E, Ólafsdóttir AF, Frid A, Wedel H, Ahlén E, Nyström T, Hellman J.

Abstract

Importance: The majority of individuals with type 1 diabetes do not meet recommended glycemic targets.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections.

Design, setting, and participants: Open-label crossover randomized clinical trial conducted in 15 diabetes outpatient clinics in Sweden between February 24, 2014, and June 1, 2016 that included 161 individuals with type 1 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of at least 7.5% (58 mmol/mol) treated with multiple daily insulin injections.

Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive treatment using a continuous glucose monitoring system or conventional treatment for 26 weeks, separated by a washout period of 17 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: Difference in HbA1c between weeks 26 and 69 for the 2 treatments. Adverse events including severe hypoglycemia were also studied.

Results: Among 161 randomized participants, mean age was 43.7 years, 45.3% were women, and mean HbA1c was 8.6% (70 mmol/mol). A total of 142 participants had follow-up data in both treatment periods. Mean HbA1c was 7.92% (63 mmol/mol) during continuous glucose monitoring use and 8.35% (68 mmol/mol) during conventional treatment (mean difference, -0.43% [95% CI, -0.57% to -0.29%] or -4.7 [-6.3 to -3.1 mmol/mol]; P < .001). Of 19 secondary end points comprising psychosocial and various glycemic measures, 6 met the hierarchical testing criteria of statistical significance, favoring continuous glucose monitoring compared with conventional treatment. Five patients in the conventional treatment group and 1 patient in the continuous glucose monitoring group had severe hypoglycemia. During washout when patients used conventional therapy, 7 patients had severe hypoglycemia.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections, the use of continuous glucose monitoring compared with conventional treatment for 26 weeks resulted in lower HbA1c. Further research is needed to assess clinical outcomes and longer-term adverse effects.

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28118454/

Share the Post:

BDI Monthly Events

May 7OMEGA Conference
May 7: As a keynote speaker at OMEGA, the First International Conference on Once-Weekly Glycated Albumin Monitoring for Diabetes, Dr. Polonsky (BDI President) will be presenting on “Glucose Monitoring and Behavior Change” (Tokyo, Japan).
May 14Case Consultation
May 14: BDI hosts the San Diego-wide, monthly case consultation meeting (for mental health professionals working in the field of diabetes). Contact us at [email protected] if you are in the greater San Diego area and would like further information about this program.
May 18T1D Meet Up
May 18: Time for another T1D meet-up! Our friends and colleagues at GrownupT1Ds, a wonderful nonprofit here in southern California, is organizing another fun social event for adults with type 1 diabetes. This time it is a Walk, Talk & Picnic, and it begins at 11 am at the Bommer Canyon Trail (1 Sunnyhill, Irvine, CA). 92084. This event is free, but please RSVP Kelly Daes at www.grownupt1ds.org.
May 23SITEC 2025
May 23: Dr. Polonsky will be presenting (virtually) on “Far Beyond Time in Range: Exploring the Promises and Limitations of CGM” at SITEC 2025, Innovation and Technology Transforming Diabetes Care (Sao Paolo, Brazil). https://sitec.diabetes.org.br/